The once (not so) insightful team that brought you The OffsideTrap on Hullfire and Jam Radio.

Hullfire Radio's answer to Andy Gray and Richard Keys, looking at the more humorous and more absurd side of football. We have no flashy Jamie Redknapp or dynamic graphics - but a few football fans nostalgically harking back to football from the 1990's!!

Join us on our open top bus ride through the important, and the not so important, parts of the footballing world!!
We are currently not recording any shows, but stayed tuned in for blogs, reaction and all sorts of fun.

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

CHELSEA AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY : A WORLD OF IMAGINATION



I would like to foreword this article by stating that I am not a Chelsea fan, and in fact would probably count myself in the bracket of football fans who would endorse the demise of Chelsea Football Club and all that goes with it. I will admit that when I am writing about Chelsea I am far from unbiased, but I would like to think that I am fair and give a reasonable account of what I see to be the failings, and the successes of Chelsea FC.

Like so many last night, I found myself suffering at the hands of another incredible European fight back from Chelsea. Another late goal, another chance for Jose Mourinho to run on to the pitch, and another famous moment to build on the clubs rapidly developing history and tradition. Because for a club that 20 years ago had little to no reputation in Europe, they have created a strong and lasting tradition. No longer can nostalgic Liverpool fans, and snobby Arsenal supporters sing their variety of chants exclaiming Chelsea’s lack of history – because now, they have one. They have a tradition of winning. Often not in style, sometimes not even deserved, but they win.

I am sure that a lot of journalists from certain media outlets will have convinced themselves that this was Mourinho’s win, his tactically astute mind saw the PSG centre backs were struggling to cope with two centre forwards, let alone three. As I’m sure you know, two substitutes scored last night, which can be manipulated to show how special the ‘Special One’ is. However, what I saw seemed quite desperate. By the time Ba came on with half an hour to go Luiz and Willian were being well outnumbered in midfield and the huge gap between defence and attack meant PSG could relax and take plenty of much needed time to stroll with the ball down the pitch. The game seemed so set that all the eyes in the room turned to the small laptop screen showing Dortmund Madrid where it looked like someone had told Klopp that you get more points for nearly scoring than actually scoring. Only when the Chelsea pressure reformed with 10 minutes to go did everyone realise; they only need one goal.

So how do Chelsea consistently defy the odds? The easy answer is Mourinho, I think most people would agree that over two legs Mourinho can beat almost anyone. But Chelsea’s courage and grit surpasses Mourinho’s time at Chelsea. I remind you that their greatest achievements in Europe came without Jose. I can accept that Mourinho started the Chelsea we know now – but not that without him they would not have won last night. This is where the clumsy metaphor in the title comes into play, for the only things that Chelsea seem to have in common with Charlie Bucket is their first letter and that neither’s story is believable. As a side note, they strongly differ on likability and finances. But if not Mourinho how do Chelsea keep on winning?

I would first suggest that belief creates belief. Because they have done it before they believe they can and will do it again. I have no doubt that as the game kicked off almost every person wearing or supporting blue in that stadium believed that Chelsea would be in the next round of the cup. This belief affects both sides, not only will Chelsea players think they can win, but PSG will start doubting themselves. As was seen last night, when PSG did look stronger they still could not mount pressure, a lot of their attacks seemed sporadic and random.

Secondly, the experience at the core of Chelsea’s team. Perhaps if there had been a full squad available Lampard would not have started, but his experience at not only playing in European competitions but playing with Chelsea in Europe is, as a MasterCard advert would say, priceless. But of course it is not only Lampard, the formidable and sickening John Terry also provides the same experience and belief. A key to Chelsea’s ‘never say die’ attitude.

Thirdly, something that even Martinez cannot adapt Steven Naismith to prevent, something that cannot be coached into a player, luck. You give Cavani those chances again and he will put them in every time. It is as simple as luck can get you through. Of course the previous two points help generate the luck and put pressure on the opponents, but Ibrahimovic being injured, Cavani snatching at chances and an accidental scoop miskick from Ba can be and has been enough.

If you asked me if this is enough to win the competition I would probably say no. Assuming Manchester United don’t progress tonight then you would have to accept that Chelsea are the weakest team left and thus the least likely to win. However, if Real Madrid fall into a lake of Chocolate and get stuck in a pipe, or Munich find themselves turning into a giant blueberry then who knows. Perhaps in this world of imagination it is possible.

1 comment:

  1. So belief, experience and luck took Chelsea into the finals according to this article?

    No mention for the hard work put in by the squad midweek to prepare? No mention towards Andre Schurrle's performance and goal? Or his signing for Chelsea by Jose?

    No mention towards the truth that Mourinho actually sprinted down the touchline in order to re-organise the team to get Chelsea through the last 7 minutes of the game with 3 strikers, along with Willian and Schurrle all on the pitch?

    You are also happy to write that it was lucky that Ibrahimovic was injured, however fail to recall that Eden Hazard was removed from the field with an injury of his own less than 20 minutes into the match?

    No mention of the "luck" PSG enjoyed when within 60 seconds the PSG crossbar was rattled twice by Oscar and Schurrle? Both times Chelsea were denied.

    At the end of the day, playing the way Chelsea played for the last 15 minutes of the game was a big risk, and it was the performances of the team as a whole that helped put the pressure on PSG to get that final goal and to prevent Cavani from doing any damage down the other end.

    I can't help but feel this is another Anti-Chelsea article, just this time its slightly more cloak and dagger than usual. Another journalist out to undermine the hard-work put in throughout the club all year round, placing emphasis on "belief", "experience" and "luck", rather than endurance, skill and tactics.

    ReplyDelete